Skip to main content

Business News Releases

Change migration system to stop rorting: new submission 

REFORMS to stop rorting of Australia’s migration system are urgently needed, according to a new submission to a government review.

Caps on the proportion of overseas students in all university courses, increased minimum wage thresholds for temporary skilled migrants, measures to stop rorting of skill migration visas, and tightening of family reunion criteria are among the recommendations made by Sustainable Population Australia (SPA).

The group also calls for a lower annual migrant intake (net overseas migration or NOM) of no more than 60,000, so that Australia’s population can stabilise at an ecologically sustainable level below 30 million people.

The submission says high levels of immigration have solved none of the problems it was intended to fix, while exacerbating all of the issues of most concern to Australians, from job insecurity and falling real wages to housing unaffordability, inadequate infrastructure, environmental degradation and greenhouse gas emissions.

The submission is to the Federal Government’s review, A Migration System for Australia’s Future, announced by the Minister for Home Affairs, Clare O’Neil, at the Jobs and Skills Summit in September.

SPA national president, Jenny Goldie said returning to a NOM of 235,000 annually, as currently proposed by the government, would simply deliver windfall gains to property developers, large employers, universities and migration agents, at the expense of ordinary Australians and the environment.

“High immigration leads to rapid population growth,” Ms Goldie said. “Yet the costs of population growth far outweigh the benefits.

“In particular, concerns about demographic ageing causing worker shortages have proven unfounded. The fiscal costs associated with population ageing are more than off-set by lower infrastructure costs in a stable population.”“Excessive overseas student numbers are weakening our higher education system and placing extra costs on Australian taxpayers.”SPA has made a number of recommendations in its submission that include:

  • A sustainable scale of migration, based on a vision for an ecologically sustainable population and economy, must be the bedrock criterion;
  • A NOM of no more than 60,000 a year should include a generous allowance for humanitarian refugees;
  • All skilled migrants should be employer-sponsored and initially temporary. Permanent skill visas should only be offered to those who have demonstrated a period of appropriately skilled employment;
  • To ensure that the jobs migrants fill are actually skilled and needed, the Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold (TSMIT) should be at least 10 percent greater than the median full-time wage, that is, the TSMIT should be set at around $90,000 a year, not the current $53,900;
  • Caps should be placed on the proportion of international students enrolled in any course, perhaps no more than 25 percent except in courses specifically intended to prepare foreign students for further study;
  • The family reunion system should be tightened to reduce its widespread abuse as a method for commercial chain migration. Only those who have gained Australian citizenship should be entitled to sponsor a newly-married spouse. At least five years on a permanent residence visa should be required before qualifying for citizenship.

www.population.org.au

ends

Further information: Jenny Goldie This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 0401 921 453Dr Jane O’Sullivan (author of submission) This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

  • Created on .

Inquiry into referendum process to hold public hearing

THE Electoral Matters Committee is holding a public hearing on December 19, 2022 as part of its examination of the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Amendment Bill 2022.

The committee will hear from representatives of the Department of Finance, the Australian Electoral Commission as well as legal, electoral and constitutional experts.

Committee Chair Kate Thwaites MP said, "The committee is looking forward to hearing views on how the bill will modernise the way in which referendums are conducted in Australia, and the value in bringing this process in line with the way today’s federal elections are conducted."

"While I know many are interested in highlighting views on issues like the referendum question, amendments to the Constitution or the merits of the Voice to Parliament, it’s important to note that this inquiry will not be examining these matters; our focus is on the provisions of the bill."

Further information about the inquiry, including published submissions and hearing transcripts, will be available on the inquiry webpage.

Public hearing details in Canberra

Time: 10am – 3.30pm AEDTDate: Monday, 19 December 2022Location: Main Committee Room, Parliament House

The hearing will be broadcast live at aph.gov.au/live.

 

ends

  • Created on .

Committee to hold hearing to review international armed conflict decision making

THE Defence Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade will hold its first public hearing tomorrow to examine how Australia makes decisions to send service personnel into international armed conflict.

The inquiry was referred by the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence, Richard Marles MP, on September 28 to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade (JSCFADT) (see Terms of Reference).

The committee will hear from witnesses advocating for both preservation of the status quo and for reform in this important area of public policy. Due to give evidence are Australians for War Powers Reform, legal scholars from academic institutions, public citizens, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Australian Defence Association, and the Australian Defence Force.

Commenting on the inquiry hearing, Defence Subcommittee Chair, Julian Hill MP said, “This public hearing will hear evidence from a range of stakeholders and witnesses to examine disparate views around the transparency and accountability of policy settings in the current exercise of these powers. The Terms of Reference also seek advice regarding the impact of any proposed policy changes on the safety and security of our Defence Force personnel.

“The Subcommittee is keen for evidence regarding the way other Westminster democracies exercise these powers, as well as examining this issue from a legal and constitutional perspective.”

Further information in relation to the inquiry is available from the JSCFADT’s website.

Public hearing details

Date: Friday 9 DecemberTime: 1pm – 6.30pm ADSTLocation: Committee Room 1R3 and via teleconference

The hearings will be audio streamed live at aph.gov.au/live.

 

ends

  • Created on .

Defence Industry Security Program Inquiry hearing

THE DEFENCE Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade will conduct a public hearing this Friday, December 9, as part of its inquiry into the Auditor-General’s Report No.4 21/22 Defence’s Contract Administration Defence Industry Security Program.

Witnesses from the Australian Industry Group, and defence contractors Babcock Australasia and Leidos Australia will appear along with the Australian National Audit Office and the Department of Defence to discuss Defence’s implementation of the Auditor-General’s recommendations and suggested improvements to the program.

Chair of the Subcommittee, Julian Hill MP said, "Ensuring security requirements are met right across the defence industry supply chain is of critical importance to Australia’s national security.

"The Auditor-General raised serious concerns and Parliament is right to expect greater assurance from Defence. This is important both for current activities and also to give maximum confidence to allies and partners regarding technology transfer and the security of Australia’s defence industrial base.

“After assessing submissions from Industry and Defence, now is the time to publicly examine in depth the extant of Defence’s progress on reform of the DISP and to hear firsthand from Defence Industry of their experiences in the program.”

Public hearing details

Date: Friday 9 DecemberTime: 9.15am – 12pm AEDTLocation: Committee Room 1R3 and via teleconference

The hearings will be audio streamed live at aph.gov.au/live.

 

ends

  • Created on .

Inquiry begins into the operation of the National Redress Scheme

THE Joint Standing Committee on Implementation of the National Redress Scheme will inquire into the operation of the scheme.

This new inquiry will look closely into a range of areas, including: The experience of First Nations applicants and applicants with disability in their dealings with the scheme; and accessibility, performance and effectiveness of support services and legal advice for survivors and their advocates.

Full details of what the inquiry will examine can be found in the terms of reference on the committee’s website.

The committee wants to hear from individuals and organisations on their experience with the scheme.

Chair of the Committee, Senator Catryna Bilyk said it was imperative that the committee heard first-hand the experiences people have had when accessing the scheme.

“There are low rates of access in parts of our community amongst people who are eligible to access the scheme,” Senator Bilyk said. “We need to understand what the barriers to access are to ensure that everyone who is eligible to seek redress does so."

The committee is seeking submissions from interested individuals and organisations on the inquiry’s terms of reference by Monday, February 27, 2023.

Submissions can respond to some or all aspects of the inquiry terms of reference.

Further information about the committee is available at https://www.aph.gov.au/redress.

 

ends

  • Created on .