Skip to main content

Business News Releases

Own a rental? ATO outlines what you need to know this tax time

THE Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is aware that residential rental property owners may be concerned about how COVID-19, floods, or bushfires have reduced their income.

This may be a result of tenants paying less or entering deferred payments plans, or travel restrictions which have affected demand for short-term rental properties. New legislation also affects the tax deductions that owners of vacant land can claim.

Assistant Commissioner Karen Foat explained that whatever the circumstances, the most important first step was to keep records of all expenses.

“Without good records, you will find it difficult to declare all your rental-related income in your tax return and work out what expenses you can claim as deductions," Ms Foat said.

Reduced rental income

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed property owners and tenants in unforeseen circumstances. Many tenants are paying reduced rent or have ceased paying because their income has been adversely affected by COVID-19.

You should include rent as income at the time it is paid, so you only need to declare the rent you have received as income. If payments by your tenants are deferred until the next financial year you do not need to include these payments until you receive them. 

While rental income may be reduced, owners will continue to incur normal expenses on their rental property and will still be able to claim these expenses in their tax return as long as the reduced rent charged is determined at arms’ length, having regard to the current market conditions. 

This applies whether the reduction in rent was initiated by the tenants or the owner.

Some owners may have rental insurance that covers a loss of income. It is important to remember that any payouts from these types of policies are assessable income and must be included in tax returns.

Many banks have moved to defer loan repayments for stressed mortgagees. In these circumstances, rental property owners are still able to claim interest being charged on the loan as a deduction -- even if the bank defers the repayments.

Short-term rentals

“We recognise that circumstances over the past six months have seen many short-term rentals see cancellations or sit vacant as a result of either COVID-19 or bushfires,” Ms Foat said.

In circumstances where COVID-19 or natural disasters have adversely affected demand, including the cancellation of existing bookings for a short-term rental property, deductions are still available provided the property was still genuinely available for rent.

If owners decided to use the property for private purposes, offered the property to family or friends for free, offered the property to others in need or stopped renting the property out they cannot claim deductions in respect of those periods.  

“Generally speaking, if your plans to rent a property in 2020 were the same as those for 2019, but were disrupted by COVID-19 or bushfires, you will still be able to claim the same proportion of expenses you would have been entitled to claim previously,” Ms Foat said.

To determine the proportion of expenses that can be claimed for short-term rental properties impacted by COVID-19 or bushfires, a reasonable approach is to apportion expenses based on the previous year’s usage pattern, unless you can show it was genuinely available for rent for a longer period of time in 2020.

If you or your family or friends move into the property to live in it because of COVID-19 or bushfires, you need to count this as private use when working out your claims in 2020.

Deductions for vacant land no longer available

For the 2020 year, expenses for holding vacant land are no longer deductible for individuals intending to build a rental property on that land but the property is not yet built. This also applies to land for which you may have been claiming expenses in previous years. 

However, this does not apply to land that is used in a business, or if there has been an exceptional circumstance like a fire or flood leading to the land being vacant.

So, if you are building a rental property, you cannot claim the deductions for the costs of holding the land, such as interest. However, if your rental property was destroyed in the bushfires and you are currently rebuilding, you can claim the costs of holding your now vacant land for up to thre years while you rebuild your rental property.

COMMON MISTAKES

Travel to rental properties

“Last year, we also saw a number of taxpayers make simple mistakes such as claiming deductions for travel to inspect their rental properties,” Ms Foat said.

Residential property owners can't claim any deductions for costs incurred in travelling to residential rental property unless they are in the rare situation of being in the business of letting rental properties.

Incorrectly claiming loan interest

Taxpayers that take out a loan to purchase a rental property can claim interest (or a portion of the interest) as a tax deduction. However, directing some of the loan money to personal use, such as paying for living expenses, buying a boat, or going on a holiday is not deductible use. The ATO uses data and analytics look closely to ensure that deductions are only claimed on the portion of the loan that relates directly to the rental property.

Capital works and repairs

“Each year, some taxpayers claim capital works as a lump sum rather than spreading the cost over a number of years. Others claim the initial work needed to get a property ready for rent immediately instead of spreading the cost over a number of years,” Ms Foat said.

Repairs or maintenance to restore something that’s broken, damaged or deteriorating in a property you already rent out are deductible immediately. Improvements or renovations are categorised as capital works and are deductible over a number of years.

Initial repairs for damage that existed when the property was purchased can’t be claimed as an immediate deduction but may be claimed over a number of years as a capital works deduction.

Short term rentals

We often see people with short term rental properties claiming for 100 percent of their expenses when they actually use the property for their own use or provide it to family and friends for free or at a reduced rate. Properties need to be rented out or be genuinely available for rent to claim a deduction.

Factors such as reserving the property or leaving it vacant over peak periods, not charging the market rate and the types of terms and conditions of the bookings are all taken into consideration when deciding if active and genuine efforts are being made to ensure a property is available for rent.

If a property is not genuinely available for rent, you need to limit your deductions to the days when it is. 

If you are allowing friends or family to stay in the property at a reduced price, you need to limit your deductions to the amount of rent received for these periods.

Don’t forget to include all your rental income, especially from sharing economy platforms. The ATO is matching data received from these providers to information in tax returns and will be following up discrepancies.

Poor record keeping

The number one cause of the ATO disallowing a claim is taxpayers being unable to produce receipts or other documents to support a claim. Furnishing fraudulent or doctored records will attract higher penalties and may also result in prosecution.

www.ato.gov.au

ends

  • Created on .

Review of the Working Holiday Maker Program and its role in the economic recovery

THE Joint Standing Committee on Migration has launched an inquiry into the Working Holiday Maker program to ensure it is working effectively to support the tourism, health care and agriculture sectors during the COVID-19 economic recovery.

Working holiday makers contribute around $3 billion a year to the Australian economy and support jobs in regional Australia. They arrive in Australia with money to spend and inject the wages they earn here back into local communities.

The program is also important for building people-to-people links and gives young Australians the chance to visit and work in over 40 countries.

Working holiday makers are a major contributor to the labour force in the agriculture, tourism, health care and aged care sectors.

There are around 50,000 fewer backpackers in Australia because of the coronavirus, but once borders re-open, they will be key to filling some roles where Australian workers are usually not available, particularly in regional areas.

The Committee will look at how backpackers can complement, rather than compete with those Australian workers laid off because of the pandemic.

Chair of the Joint Standing Committee on Migration, Julian Leeser MP said given the COVID-19 pandemic had effectively closed Australia’s borders and stopped the flow of working holiday makers, it was important to examine how this would impact the economy and look closely at the program to ensure it is working in Australia’s interest.

“The very clear focus at the moment must be on getting Australians back into work and how migration can support our economic recovery,” Mr Leeser said.

“We will be looking closely at the program to make sure it is supporting Australian jobs and making visa holders available to support businesses that need more people, particularly in regional communities which have relied on these workers in the past,” Mr Leeser said.

The Federal Government has already made changes to allow working holiday makers working in critical sectors – such as health care and agriculture – to stay longer with one employer and to be eligible for a further visa to continue working in these sectors.

In February, the Government also made changes to allow backpackers to better assist with the recovery and rebuilding efforts following the bushfires that devastated many rural and regional communities.

The Committee is encouraging people to contribute to the process. Submissions to the inquiry will be accepted until July 24, 2020.

For more information about this Committee, visit its website.

ends

  • Created on .

Unfair contract terms: lessons to be learned says IPA

THE corporate regulator took on the case against Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for unfair terms within small business contracts and the lessons learnt should sound warning bells to others, according to the Institute of Public Accountants (IPA).

“The IPA has been a long-time advocate for leveling the playing field when it comes to unfair contract terms for small business and we commend ASIC for taking this up with Australia’s fifth largest retail bank,” IPA group executive policy and technical, Vicki Stylianou said.

“In the case of the Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, the Federal Court found that the unfair terms in the small business loan contract had caused a major imbalance in the parties’ right and obligations under the contract, and further, the terms would cause detriment to the small businesses involved if the terms were utilised.

“ASIC pursued the case, noting that some of the unfair terms provided the bank with the ability to vary the terms and conditions of the contract without giving the small business borrower due warning, as well as the capability to exit the contract without penalty.

“This case should herald a sharp warning to other financial institutions and corporations, that the insertion of unfair contract terms is potentially breaking the law.

“It is also a telling factor that legislation around unfair contract terms is only as good as the enforcement that prevails as was this case with the bank.

“Small businesses should also be wary in entering contracts, ensuring they understand the terms and conditions and where necessary seek advice from their trusted adviser before signing,” Ms Stylianou said.

About the Institute of Public Accountants

The IPA, formed in 1923, is one of Australia’s three legally recognised professional accounting bodies.  In late 2014, the IPA acquired the Institute of Financial Accountants in the UK and formed the IPA Group, with more than 37,000 members and students in over 80 countries.  The IPA Group is the largest SME focused accountancy organisation in the world. The IPA is a member of the International Federation of Accountants, the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board and the Confederation of Asian and Pacific Accountants. 

ends

  • Created on .

Magnitsky inquiry to hear from Gary Kasparov

AN INQUIRY into whether Australia should adopt ‘Magnitsky-style’ laws will hear from world champion chess grandmaster and human rights commentator Gary Kasparov at a teleconference hearing this week.

The inquiry, run by the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, Human Rights Sub-committee will be led by Sub-Committee chair Kevin Andrews MP, who said the Sub-Committee was looking forward to the opportunity to speak to Mr Kasparov.

"In addition to his career as a professional chess player, Mr Kasparov has become notable in recent years for his advocacy for democratic principles around the world, and for his criticism of elements of the Russian Government," Mr Andrews said.

"Mr Kasparov has been a strong advocate for Magnitsky-style legislation in other jurisdictions, and we are grateful that he has agreed to provide his perspective on such legislation in an Australian context."

Also appearing at the hearing will be retired Australian diplomat Tony Kevin. In contrast with Mr Kasparov, Mr Kevin opposes Magnitsky-style legislation, writing in a submission to the inquiry that in his view such laws violate "international law and commonly accepted international practice".

"While submissions to the inquiry have been overwhelmingly supportive of targeted sanctions, the committee has noted some evidence with differing views," Mr Andrews said.

"This public hearing will give the Sub-Committee the opportunity to interrogate arguments both for and against Magnitsky-style legislation in detail."

More information about this inquiry, including submissions received by the Committee to date, is available on the Committee’s website.

Public hearing details

Date: Thursday 25 June 2020
Time: 3:15pm – 4.45pm
Location: Via teleconference

The hearings will be streamed at aph.gov.au/live.

ends

  • Created on .

QRC welcomes Federal Government’s $125 million exploration boost

THE Queensland Resources Council has welcomed the Federal Government’s $125 million funding extension to Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future (EFTF) Program.

QRC chief executive Ian Macfarlane said the investment would lead to a clearer understanding of the geological structures in Queensland and Australia.

“This is a vote of confidence in the exploration industry from the Morrison Government and I congratulate the Federal Resources Minister Keith Pitt for backing the exploration industry which is hurting from the economic impacts from COVID-19," Mr Macfarlane said. 

“Geoscientific data plays a critical role in framing policy settings from government and this program provides an in-depth understanding of our resource assets which belong to all Queenslanders.”

QRC’s exploration focused member organisation the Queensland Exploration Council (QEC) said this program was a vital tool for the exploration industry. 

“Queensland is blessed with a rich source of minerals and the skilled people to find them. Connecting this to supportive governments will ensure the minerals discovered today are the foundations of tomorrow’s resources industry,” QEC chair Kim Wainwright said.

‘Industry has long understood the return on investment potential of geoscience data and the recent ACIL Allen analysis showed the total potential benefits flowing from the activities in the current EFTF could be between $446 million and $2.5 billion."

The EFTF program has been in operation for four years.  

Link to Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future (EFTF) Program: https://www.ga.gov.au/eftf

Link to ACIL Allen analysis: https://www.acilallen.com.au/projects/program-evaluation/exploring-for-the-future-program-return-on-investment-analysis

ends

  • Created on .